<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Never bury your optimized content &#8211; and about styles of burying</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dangerous-thinking.com/2008/07/24/never-bury-your-optimized-content-and-about-styles-of-burying/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dangerous-thinking.com/2008/07/24/never-bury-your-optimized-content-and-about-styles-of-burying/</link>
	<description>David Rosam&#039;s Blog. If I can&#039;t fit it in a Tweet, it goes in here!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:58:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rosam</title>
		<link>http://www.dangerous-thinking.com/2008/07/24/never-bury-your-optimized-content-and-about-styles-of-burying/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rosam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerous-thinking.com/?p=1031#comment-397</guid>
		<description>@Clive Walker

I&#039;d say that the sitemap is there to get the content properly spidered; what we&#039;ve seen is on a site that is properly spidered according to Google Webmaster Tools.

So, I&#039;d say spidering isn&#039;t the issue.

The sitemap does one other thing. It shows the spiders the layout of the site, of course so with or without the sitemap, the search engines are aware of how deeply the content is buried. 

That means, I think, that the sitemap has no effect on what we&#039;ve observed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Clive Walker</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say that the sitemap is there to get the content properly spidered; what we&#8217;ve seen is on a site that is properly spidered according to Google Webmaster Tools.</p>
<p>So, I&#8217;d say spidering isn&#8217;t the issue.</p>
<p>The sitemap does one other thing. It shows the spiders the layout of the site, of course so with or without the sitemap, the search engines are aware of how deeply the content is buried. </p>
<p>That means, I think, that the sitemap has no effect on what we&#8217;ve observed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clive Walker</title>
		<link>http://www.dangerous-thinking.com/2008/07/24/never-bury-your-optimized-content-and-about-styles-of-burying/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>Clive Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerous-thinking.com/?p=1031#comment-396</guid>
		<description>How is this affected by a sitemap page? Surely, with a sitemap page, the route to the optimised page would be Home -&gt; Sitemap -&gt; Optimised Page? [assuming that the Optimised Page is linked on the sitemap page]. Or are you describing a situation where there is no sitemap page?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this affected by a sitemap page? Surely, with a sitemap page, the route to the optimised page would be Home -&gt; Sitemap -&gt; Optimised Page? [assuming that the Optimised Page is linked on the sitemap page]. Or are you describing a situation where there is no sitemap page?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.dangerous-thinking.com/2008/07/24/never-bury-your-optimized-content-and-about-styles-of-burying/feed/ ) in 0.40699 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 4:58 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 5:58 pm UTC -->
