<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s the point of blogging when there&#8217;s no RSS?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dangerous-thinking.com/2003/04/24/whats-the-point-of-blogging-when-theres-no-rss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dangerous-thinking.com/2003/04/24/whats-the-point-of-blogging-when-theres-no-rss/</link>
	<description>David Rosam&#039;s Blog. If I can&#039;t fit it in a Tweet, it goes in here!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:58:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias</title>
		<link>http://www.dangerous-thinking.com/2003/04/24/whats-the-point-of-blogging-when-theres-no-rss/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2003 11:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerous-thinking.com/?p=473#comment-159</guid>
		<description>Timothy Appnel suggests we should offer a choice of feeds: http://webservices.xml.com/pub/a/ws/2002/11/19/rssfeedquality.html?page=2

Of course some people will take this to an extreme and offer special feeds for every aspect of their online activity...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Timothy Appnel suggests we should offer a choice of feeds: http://webservices.xml.com/pub/a/ws/2002/11/19/rssfeedquality.html?page=2</p>
<p>Of course some people will take this to an extreme and offer special feeds for every aspect of their online activity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Rosam</title>
		<link>http://www.dangerous-thinking.com/2003/04/24/whats-the-point-of-blogging-when-theres-no-rss/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>David Rosam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 15:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerous-thinking.com/?p=473#comment-158</guid>
		<description>Hi Matthias

I think it&#039;s a personal thing - some people hate some RSS feeds that supply the full text, as they prefer to scan the headlines and the first few words!

You can&#039;t please all of the people all of the time, I guess!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matthias</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a personal thing &#8211; some people hate some RSS feeds that supply the full text, as they prefer to scan the headlines and the first few words!</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t please all of the people all of the time, I guess!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthias Gutfeldt</title>
		<link>http://www.dangerous-thinking.com/2003/04/24/whats-the-point-of-blogging-when-theres-no-rss/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthias Gutfeldt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2003 10:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dangerous-thinking.com/?p=473#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Your posting was the first hit when I was looking for &quot;RSS what&#039;s the point?&quot;. 

The plain text information snippets and headlines make sense to me: I can quickly scan them for items of interest. 

But the next step doesn&#039;t make sense to me: In order to get more information and read the whole article, I usually have to get the webpage (or fire it up in my browser, depending on software). I do get the article, but it comes complete with navigation, blogrolls, layout, advertising - basically the whole traditional webpage shebang!

This is a waste, and I wonder what&#039;s the point? In my opinion it would be more sensible to offer the complete article in this new and efficient format, and then provide -as an option- a link to the webpage.

But I guess as an RSS newbie I must be missing something.


Matthias</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your posting was the first hit when I was looking for &#8220;RSS what&#8217;s the point?&#8221;. </p>
<p>The plain text information snippets and headlines make sense to me: I can quickly scan them for items of interest. </p>
<p>But the next step doesn&#8217;t make sense to me: In order to get more information and read the whole article, I usually have to get the webpage (or fire it up in my browser, depending on software). I do get the article, but it comes complete with navigation, blogrolls, layout, advertising &#8211; basically the whole traditional webpage shebang!</p>
<p>This is a waste, and I wonder what&#8217;s the point? In my opinion it would be more sensible to offer the complete article in this new and efficient format, and then provide -as an option- a link to the webpage.</p>
<p>But I guess as an RSS newbie I must be missing something.</p>
<p>Matthias</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.dangerous-thinking.com/2003/04/24/whats-the-point-of-blogging-when-theres-no-rss/feed/ ) in 0.54916 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 4:27 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 5:27 pm UTC -->
